Table 2.

Up-to-date Series of TORS for Upper Aerodigestive Tract Cancer with Assessment of Surgical Margins.

Author Year Site (all T stages unless otherwise indicated) Patients Close Margin Definition Use of Frozen Section Inadequate or Positive Margins on Final Pathology Local Control
Boudreaux45 2009 Oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, supraglottic 29 NA yes 0 NA
Weinstein46 2010 Oropharynx 47 ≤2 mm yes 1 (2%) 98%
White47 2010 Oral cavity, oropharynx, supraglottic 89 NA yes 3 (3%) 97%
Hurtuk48 2011 Oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx (1–3) 54 ≤2 mm yes 4 (7%) 98%
Lawson49 2011 Oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, supraglottic (1–3) 24 NA yes 0 92%
Hans50 2011 Oropharynx, hypopharynx, supraglottic 23 NA NA 1 (4%) 100%
Aubry51 2011 Oropharynx, hypopharynx, supraglottic (1–3) 17 NA yes 2 (12%) 100%
Genden52 2011 Oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx (1–3) 30 NA yes 10 (33%) 91%
Park53 2012 Hypopharyngeal 23 ≤5 mm NA 2 (9%) 100%
Park54 2013 Oropharynx 39 ≤5 mm NA 2 (5%) 95%
Park55 2013 Supraglottic (1–3) 16 NA NA 2 (12%) 100%
*Mean follow-up time <12 months.

TORS, transoral robotic surgery; NA, data not available.

RMMJ Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Rambam Health Care Campus 2014 April; 5(2): e0016. ISSN: 2076-9172
Published online 2014 April 28. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10150