While the eponym Wolff–Parkinson–White (WPW) syndrome is attributed to the landmark article published by the trio in 1930, 1 other isolated case reports of the same entity were previously reported in the literature. ^{2 , 3} Over the ensuing years this entity has captivated the interest of anatomists, clinical cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, clinical electrophysiologists, and more recently geneticists.

The story properly begins with the elucidation of the specialized conduction system of the heart. It was long appreciated that electrical connections bridged the atrial and ventricular chambers. 4 ^{, 5} Stanley Kent in 1893 described lateral atrioventricular (AV) connections and thought these constituted the normal specialized AV conduction system. ⁶ This work proved controversial and was, in fact, rejected by such notables as Sir Thomas Lewis and Keith Flack. In a later study Dr. Kent described lateral connections with node-like structures which he felt constituted the normal AV conduction system. ⁷

The work of His ⁸ and Tawara ⁹ clearly established the anatomy of the AV node and His–Purkinje system. Moreover, they proved that section of the His bundle resulted in complete AV block and described the His–Purkinje system.

It was clearly Wood et al. ¹⁰ who first described the presence of a right-sided accessory pathway (AP) in a patient with an ECG pattern of pre-excitation and Öhnell who described left-sided APs in patients with pre-excitation. ¹¹ Other pioneer observations include those of Mahaim and Benatt who described connections between the AV node or His bundle to fascicles on ventricular myocardium. ¹²

In an important study, Lev and Lerner ¹³ presented a detailed investigation of 33 fetal and neonatal hearts and found no evidence for any lateral AV communications. They interpreted Kent’s finding of nodal tissue as being really atrial tissue: in neonates there is sparse collagen in the AV groove, and, depending on the angle of the sections, these may be misinterpreted as AV connections. It is, therefore, surprising that the eponym “Kent” bundle is still used to describe abnormal AV connections.

Drs Wolff, Parkinson, and White are correctly credited with describing the entity that bears their names. Their article was published in the American Heart Journal in August 1930. 1 They described 11 patients with short P-R and bundle branch block, who also suffered with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and/or atrial fibrillation (AF).

None of these patients had any evidence of structural cardiac disease, and the investigators confirmed (actually had reported previously) that administration of atropine would serve to normalize AV conduction with disappearance of the “bundle branch block” pattern (Figure 1). The authors felt that the entity was “neurogenic” in origin and was of little clinical consequence.

Figure 1 Simultaneous recording of three-lead ECG obtained from the original article by Drs Wolff, Parkinson, and White. 1 (Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.)

It was only later that Mines 14 demonstrated that the concept of circus movement tachycardia was as a mechanism of tachycardia. According to T.N. James, ¹⁵ it was Holzmann and Scherf ¹⁶ in 1952 who were the first to describe pre-excitation as being due to antegrade conduction over an accessory AV connection.

The incredible contributions of Pick, Langendorf, and Katz deserve mention. ^{17 – 19} They undertook detailed and painstaking analyses of literally thousands of strips from patients with the WPW syndrome and concluded that the arrhythmias were due to differences in conduction properties between the AV node and the AP, which allowed for initiation of SVT by premature beats. Remarkably they described concealed conduction into the pathway and the relationship between SVT and AF for these patients. Much of their pioneering observations were substantiated by intracardiac studies.

Drs Durrer and Wellens ^{20 , 21} were the first to systematically use programmed electrical studies in numbers to clearly define the tachycardia mechanisms in patients with WPW. They showed that premature cardiac stimulation could induce orthodromic (SVT) (antegrade conduction over the AV node, retrograde conduction over the AP) as well as antidromic tachycardias (antegrade conduction over the AP, retrograde conduction over the node). These observations and others ^{22 , 23} provided the framework for the use of intracardiac studies to define AP location and physiology.

Prior to the current era of catheter ablation, patients with SVT intractable to drug therapy were treated with surgical dissection of the AV junction. 24 ^{, 25} This approach was largely used for management of the patient with atrial fibrillation refractory to drug therapy but would not be appropriate for those with APs since extirpation of the AV junction would not mitigate against rapid conduction over an AP. Durrer and Roos ²⁶ performed intraoperative mapping and cooling (in an important proof of concept experiment) to locate and transiently prevent conduction in a patient with a right-sided AP. Subsequently Burchell et al. ²⁷ used intraoperative mapping and abolished pre-excitation with a local injection of procainamide. A limited surgical incision over this area resulted in only transient loss of pre-excitation. Sealy et al. ²⁸ were the first to successfully ablate an AP in a human. The Duke team initially used an epicardial approach but subsequently showed that APs in all locations (both free wall and septal) could be successfully ablated using an endocardial technique. ²⁹ Only later was a cryo-epicardial technique used by Guiraudon et al. ³⁰

The technique of catheter ablation of the AV junction was introduced by Scheinman et al. in 1981. 31 The technique involved use of high-energy direct-current shocks delivered to the region of the AV junction. This was followed by attempts to use catheter techniques for ablation of APs in various locations. In 1984 Fisher et al. ³² used this technique for attempted ablation of left-sided APs via the coronary sinus. This technique was abandoned due to limited efficacy and risk of cardiac tamponade. In 1984 Morady and Scheinman ³³ reported a catheter technique for right posteroseptal APs associated with a 65% efficacy without cardiac tamponade as the shock was delivered just outside the os of the coronary sinus. In addition Warin et al. described successful catheter ablation of free wall APs using high-energy D/C shock. ³⁴

The subsequent introduction of radiofrequency energy for catheter ablation ³⁵ completely revolutionized our approach to the management of patients with WPW (Figure 2). Use of radiofrequency energy, as well as improved mapping and catheter design, has had a dramatic impact on patient management. The remarkable work particularly of Jackman et al. introduced techniques of both recording and ablation of AP potentials. ³⁶ The modern era of widespread use of radiofrequency ablation for patients with AP-mediated tachycardia was documented by the pioneering efforts of several groups. ^{36 – 38} Moreover, the efficacy and safety of these procedures have been documented by registry and prospective studies. ^{39 , 40}

Figure 2 Schema showing use of catheter technique for ablation of a right free wall accessory pathway.

Catheter ablative procedures have become the method of choice for care of patients with the WPW syndrome. While incremental improvements in catheter design or mapping systems will undoubtedly facilitate ablative procedures, the major advances appear to reside in the area of molecular genetics and biology. Mehdirad et al. 41 described an autosomal dominant form of WPW associated with cardiomyopathy and progressive cardiac conduction system disease linked to chromosome 7q3. Subsequently Gollob et al. ⁴² identified a missense mutation in the gene that encodes the gamma-2 regulatory subunit of AMP-activated protein kinase which was associated with the WPW syndrome in two families. These families were characterized as having cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, multiple APs, and a poor prognosis. Protein kinase is involved in the phosphorylation of multiple metabolic pathways including energy substrate regulation. The genetic abnormality has been associated with cardiac glycogen storage disease. ⁴³

Further studies have defined the role of epicardial derived cells in the formation of the AV groove. ⁴⁴ Conceivably, defects in function of these primitive cells act as progenitor for residual muscle connections between atrium and ventricle. More recently studies involving activation of notch signaling provided fully penetrant APs as well as ventricular pre-excitation in the developing mouse heart. ⁴⁵ Alternatively, inhibition of notch signaling leads to a hypoplastic AV node with loss of slowly conducting cells.