Review Article

Biomarkers in Body Fluids as Indicators of Skeletal Maturity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
RMMJ Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal Rambam Health Care Campus 2023 October; 14(4): e0021. ISSN: 2076-9172
Published online 2023 August 30. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10506

Biomarkers in Body Fluids as Indicators of Skeletal Maturity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Priyanka Kapoor, M.D.S.,1,2 Rajiv Balachandran, M.D.S.,3 Aman Chowdhry, M.D.S.,1,4 Giuseppe Perinetti, D.D.S., M.S., Ph.D.,5 and Om Prakash Kharbanda, M.D.S., M.M.Ed. (Dundee), M. Orth. R.C.S. (Edinburgh), F.D.S. R.C.S. (England and Edinburgh)6,7*

1School of Dental Sciences, Sharda University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
2Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
3Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
4Department of Oral Pathology & Microbiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi, India
5Private Practice, Nocciano (PE), Italy
6Faculty of Dental Sciences, M.S. Ramaih University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, India
7Health Sciences, M.S. Ramaih University of Applied Sciences, Bangalore, India

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dr.opk15@gmail.com

Abstract

Objectives
This review aimed to critically appraise the evidence for biomarkers in blood serum, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), saliva, and urine in comparison with standard radiographic indices for skeletal maturation assessment.

Materials and Methods
A thorough literature search in multiple databases was conducted for biomarkers in body fluids for skeletal maturation assessed with cervical vertebrae in lateral cephalograms or on hand-wrist radiographs. Different combinations including free text, MeSH terms, and Boolean operators were used. Two researchers used strict inclusion and exclusion criteria to screen title, abstract, and full text, and used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 instrument for risk of bias assessment of individual studies. Meta-analysis was performed on eligible studies using RevMan 5 software.

Results
A total of 344 articles were screened, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria and quality assessment. The skeletal maturity indicators included insulin-like growth factors (IGF-1), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), vitamin D binding protein (DBP), parathormone-related protein (PTHrP), osteocalcin, metalloproteins, and serotransferrin (TF) along with different metabolites. At puberty, a significant rise was seen in IGF-1, DBP, ALP, osteocalcin, TF, and BALP. However, the serum DHEAS and PTHrP increased from pre-pubertal to post-pubertal stages. Due to the data heterogeneity, a meta-analysis could be performed on seven studies in total on IGF-1 in serum and blood. Of these, five were included for data in males and six in females, and four studies on IGF-1 in serum and blood. A significant difference in IGF-1 levels was seen between stages of peak pubertal growth spurt (CS3 and CS4) and decelerating pubertal growth (CS5) compared with growth initiation stage (CS2).

Conclusions
Pubertal growth spurts were correlated with peak serum IGF-1 and BALP in both sexes individually. Peak ALP levels in GCF were correlated with the pubertal spurt in a combined sample of males and females. Standard biofluid collection protocols and homogeneity in sampling and methodology are strongly recommended for future research.

Keywords: Biomarkers, CVMI, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), saliva, serum, skeletal maturation index

INTRODUCTION

Skeletal maturity evaluation (SME) is integral to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning for a successful outcome. Management of certain skeletal malocclusions including a retrognathic or small mandible can be treated with jaw growth modification. The facial growth modifications are known to perform best at pubertal onset and attaining peak height velocity (PHV). In addition, orthognathic surgery with orthodontics is performed only after cessation of active skeletal growth, for which assessment of growth status becomes extremely important.1 Various anthropometric and radiographic methods are used in clinical practice. The radiographic techniques include hand-wrist radiographs based on changes in morphology and ossification of carpal bones, and lateral cephalograms based on cervical vertebral maturation index (CVMI), the staging of which is commonly referred to as cervical stages (CS), and cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) stages.1 These have been correlated with dental maturation stages, PHV, and other physical growth parameters in studies for skeletal maturation.24

Todd developed SME based on hand-wrist radiographs, which Greulich and Pyle popularized by creating an atlas.5 This method was further developed as a scoring system by Tanner Whitehouse5 and as 11 skeletal maturity indicators (SMIs) by Fishman6 and further studied solely for the middle phalanx of the third finger (MP3) for skeletal maturation.7 The CVMI on lateral cephalograms has been extensively studied for SME,8,9 primarily in dentofacial disharmonies,912 and is subject to inter-operator variations.13 In comparison, the hand-wrist radiographs are still considered more reliable up to the age of 14, although with a risk of additional radiation exposure.14

Contemporary orthodontic research is inclined toward biomarkers associated with bone turnover in growth and remodeling.15 Although this research has been well established in association with tooth movement,1618 the role of such biomarkers in skeletal maturation is yet to be recognized. Evidence supports a rise in the level of bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP) in the serum of pre-pubertal girls, followed by a decrease at puberty and late puberty. 19 Peak serum insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and BALP are seen in pubertal onset, while pubertal stage shows peak serum osteocalcin and type I procollagen peptide.19 The biomarkers IGF-1 and BALP have shown a definite relationship with cervical maturation staging.2023

While the biomarkers for tooth movement are mainly found in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF),16,17 the markers for skeletal maturation are generally sourced in blood and serum.2022 Certain body fluids are advantageous in terms of non-invasive and repeatable collection, hence the current trend has shifted focus on biomarker research in GCF and saliva where variations in levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), vitamin D binding protein (DBP), and serotransferrin (TF) at different stages of skeletal maturation have been reported.24,25 Levels of ALP have been studied in the saliva of rats for systemic bone turnover26 and are currently being explored in human saliva for bone maturation.27 A recent scoping review5 studied biomarkers of skeletal maturation in saliva and GCF but did not include other body fluids, i.e. blood, serum, and urine, while another recent systematic review28 focused only on serum biomarkers in association with radiographic skeletal maturity indicators.

Hence, the current systematic review is aimed at performing a critical appraisal of all available evidence related to biomarkers in different body fluids (blood, GCF, saliva, serum, and urine), compared with established radiographic indices for skeletal maturation, i.e. CVMI, hand-wrist, and middle phalanx of the third finger. We aim to outline the biomarker dynamics in different skeletal maturation stages and explore association(s) of biomarker levels with maxillo-mandibular growth parameters, including average, early, and late maturers, and sex differences.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Protocol and Registration
The current systematic review and meta-analysis were performed after prior registration in PROSPERO (CRD42016049051).

Eligibility Criteria, PICO
The primary research aim was to study the change in biomarker levels in different body fluids (GCF, saliva, blood, serum, and urine) of orthodontic subjects during different phases of skeletal maturation. The research was framed using the PICO (population, intervention, comparator, outcome) format, as follows: participants, orthodontic subjects (both males and females in all age groups); intervention, biomarker collection in different body fluids; comparator, standardized radiographic indices for skeletal maturity; outcome, the primary outcomes were biomarker dynamics in different skeletal maturity stages, and the secondary outcome was variation in biomarker levels with sex or other skeletal parameters like mandibular growth or changes in vertical height. There was no restriction on language or date.

Information Sources, Search Strategy, and Study Selection
A thorough literature search was conducted, in April 2023, in major databases with a pre-determined search strategy (Supplementary Table 1)—PubMed, Web of Science, Directory of Open Access Journals, Scopus, and Embase, along with a hand search and reference tracking. Two reviewers (PK and RB) independently applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies (Supplementary Table 2). Forty-two studies were shortlisted based on full-text retrieval and an in-depth review. Of these, one study was excluded due to non-availability of a radiographic comparator.29 The remaining 41 studies were further assessed for quality with a modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 instrument.30
Table 1Table 1
Participant and Study Characteristics of Included Studies.
Table 2Table 2
Biofluid Collection and Biomarker Analysis.

Risk of Bias/Quality Assessment
The risk of bias (ROB) and applicability testing of all the studies (n=41) was done by two observers independently (PK and RB) with the modified QUADAS-2 tool,30 using the four primary domains (Supplementary Figure 1). Domain 2 (index test) was performed separately for each body fluid: saliva, GCF, blood/serum, and urine. The reference standard for skeletal maturity assessment was radiographic indices using lateral cephalogram (CS/CVM staging),9,10,12,31,32 intraoral periapical radiograph (IOPA) (middle phalanx of the third finger [MP3]),7,11,33 and hand-wrist (skeletal maturity indicators [SMI]).6,3436
Figure 1Figure 1
PRISMA Flowchart Outlining the Selection of Studies for this Review and the Meta-analysis.

The quality assessment by QUADAS-2 found 33 out of a total of 41 studies to be eligible for inclusion in the review.2025,27,3762 The eight studies that were excluded were based on an unclear ROB,63 high ROB,64 and an unclear ROB and applicability.6570

The final inclusion of articles in the review after quality assessment are presented in a PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).71

Data extraction. Two observers (PK and RB) performed the detailed data extraction independently (Tables 1 and 2). Any discordance in the findings was discussed with two other investigators (OPK and AC), and a consensus was reached.

Meta-analysis. Due to heterogeneity in studies, meta-analysis was not possible for all the studies but only for studies evaluating IGF-1 levels in serum among CVMI 2, 3, 4, and 5. Seven studies 22,43,44,46,48,53,56 qualified for the meta-analysis based on evaluation method (ELISA), unit of measurement (ng/mL), and availability of mean, SD (standard deviation), and sample size. The meta-analysis was performed separately for males and females, with five studies22,43,44,53,56 and six studies22,43,44,46,48,56 included for evaluation of IGF-1, respectively. In the studies for males, one study53 was considered only for assessment of CVMI 3, 4, and 5 based on the availability of data.

Statistical analysis. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan (version 5.4) software. The heterogeneity and chi-square tests were performed, and a 95% confidence interval was calculated and graphically represented. A random-effect model was utilized to reduce the existing variability, and forest plots were generated to graphically represent the weighted mean difference and overall test for significance.

RESULTS (TABLE 1)

Participants
The number of subjects evaluated in the different studies were in the ranges 1–50 (9 studies), 51–100 (15 studies), and 101 and above (9 studies). The male-to-female ratio was unequal in 17 studies, with only female subjects recruited in three studies46,48,55 and only male subjects in one study.53

Study Characteristics (Table 1)
Studies employed different indices for SME; the CVM staging developed by Baccetti et al.9 was used in 18 studies (Table 1). 2325,37,3941,44,4951,5355,57,59,60,62 This was followed by using the six cervical stages of Hassel and Farman12 in six studies;2022,46,48,56 of Baccetti et al.10 in two studies;27,45 of Hagg and Taranger11 in one study;43 of McNamara31 in one study;42 and using the quantitative cervical vertebral maturation (QCVM) method by Chen.52 Hand-wrist radiographs used the Fishman index6 with 11 SMIs42,47,61 and five SMI stages.38 The study design was cross-sectional in most studies and longitudinal in four studies with a repeated collection of biomarkers.20,50,51,57

Collection of Body Fluids and Handling (Tables 1 and 2)
Different body fluids were used, including blood and serum in 20 studies, GCF in four studies, saliva in eight studies, and urine in one study. Studies specified the time of sample collection in 17 out of 34 studies: between 09.00 and 12.00, or between 12.00 and 15.00. Saliva and GCF collection studies involved oral prophylaxis, regimen instructions, and gingival and periodontal indices for oral hygiene assessment. The sample collection of GCF was done by paper points, saliva by passive drool or parotid saliva, and blood by venous blood or dried blood spot collection. Biomarker analysis was done by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), radioimmunoassay, spectrophotometry, two site chemiluminescent assay, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, immunoassay, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, and immunoradiometric assay.

Levels of Biomarkers in Association with Skeletal Maturation (Tables 1 and 2)
The biomarkers investigated in most of the studies were IGF-1,2022, 37, 38, 40, 4244, 46, 4951, 53, 5557, 61, 62 ALP,25,27,40,59,60 dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS),39,44,47,58 and BALP,20,21,23 with sporadic assessment of DBP24,45 and TF,24,45 IGF binding protein (IGFBP-3),37,38,46 IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio,37,38,46 osteocalcin,22 PTHrP,54 and metabolites.41

Insulin-like growth factor-1. In serum and saliva, IGF-1 showed a statistically significant rise in the pubertal (CS3, CS4), compared with pre-pubertal (CS1, CS2) and post-pubertal stages (CS5, CS6).7,43,27,21,20,22,53,46,48,55,56,62

The peak levels corresponded with high-velocity stages (SMIs 6–8) on hand-wrist radiographs38,61 and at MP3 stage on IOPA.55

The sex-related difference in IGF-1 showed an early onset of puberty in females with peak IGF-1 at CVMI 3, while males showed a peak at CVMI 4 followed by a sustained rise in levels.21,22,37 Peak levels varied in both sexes, with levels higher in females49 and in males22 in one study each.

A positive correlation of IGF-1 was established with varied biomarkers across different skeletal stages. A correlation was documented with BALP,20 osteocalcin across CVMI 1–4 (males)22 and CS1–3 (females),22 and IGFBP-3 across CVMI 1–3.46 Also, IGF-1 levels in serum and urine levels showed a positive correlation in CS 1–4.48 In saliva, QCVM II (high velocity) shows higher IGF-1 levels than QCVM I, III, or IV.52 With the chronological age, IGF-1 showed a positive correlation till CS3, followed by a negative correlation at CS4 and CS5.53

Many longitudinal studies found a positive association of IGF-1 with maxillo-mandibular growth parameters, anterior facial height, mandibular plane, and the type of orthodontic forces.20,51,52,57

Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase. Levels of BALP peaked at CVMI 3 in both sexes, but slightly earlier than IGF-1.20,21 Serum IGF-1 and BALP showed a statistically significant correlation (P<0.01),20,21 but the latter was considered more accurate for skeletal maturation.20

Osteocalcin. The mean serum osteocalcin levels showed distinction in sex, with an increase from CVMI 1 to CVMI 5 in males and from CVMI 1 to CVMI 3 in females, following the levels of IGF-1 across the skeletal stages but showing no significant variation across stages. The levels were higher in males than in females. A significant correlation between IGF-1 and osteocalcin was seen in different skeletal stages, both in males and in females (P<0.05).22

Vitamin-D binding protein and serotransferrin. Studies in GCF showed a significantly higher percentage of DBP and TF in pubertal as compared to pre- or post-pubertal stage in both maxillary and mandibular incisors.24,45 But no difference in TF and DBP levels was found with malocclusion (class I and class II) or sex.24

Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. The levels of DHEAS were higher in pubertal compared to pre-pubertal stages in one study,44 while other studies showed a non-significant increase in mean DHEAS levels from pre-pubertal to post-pubertal stage.39,47,58 Additionally, males showed a higher peak serum DHEAS at CS4 (685.33±39.11 nmol/mL) than the female peak at CS3 (578.12± 13.76 nmol/mL).44

Alkaline phosphatase. Evaluation of levels of ALP in saliva combined with chronological age was able to predict pubertal growth better as compared to evaluating the levels of salivary ALP alone.27 The level of salivary ALP activity in CS2 (P<0.001) and CS5 (P=0.004) was significantly higher than at stage 1. In contrast, the total ALP protein concentration in saliva was highest at CS3 and CS5 as compared to other stages.27 Level of ALP was lower in females than in males.27 Levels of ALP and activity in GCF were twice as high in the pubertal than in the pre-pubertal/post-pubertal stage, and a negative correlation of GCF ALP levels was established with the pre- and post-pubertal phase.25,59,60

Parathormone-related protein. Serum parathormone-related protein (PTHrP) levels followed a consistent pattern of increase from CS1 to CS5 with a correlation coefficient of 10.68 (P<0.001), a peak shown at CS5, and thereafter a sharp decline at CS6 (coefficient of 0.676). The correlation with age was significant at CS1 (P=0.03) and CS2 (P=0.005).54

Metabolomics. Metabolites like glycerol (P<0.01) and glyceric acid (P<0.05) showed significant difference between pre-pubertal and post-pubertal stages. Pre-pubertal and post-pubertal stages showed difference in mannose (P=0.12) and pyroglutamic acid, while pubertal and post-pubertal stages showed difference in glucose and pyroglutamic acid.41 Besides, the metabolites also differed with dental and chronological age.

The associations of marker levels with skeletal staging, sex, craniofacial parameters, and their significant inter-relationships have been compiled in Table 3.

Table 3Table 3
Results Associated with Variation in Mediator Levels in Different Skeletal Maturation Stages.

Outcome of Meta-analysis
The random-effect model was used due to significant heterogeneity among the primary studies. The results of separate analysis for males and females depicted a highly significant rise in IGF-1 from CVMI 2 to CVMI 3, 4, and 5 in females (Figure 2A). In males, a highly significant rise in IGF-1 was seen from CVMI 2 to CVMI 3 and 4, but no significant difference was seen between CVMI 2 and 5 (Figure 2B). Supplementary Figure 2 (A and B) presents comparison of IGF-1 levels in males and females between CVMI 3, 4, and 5. A pictorial representation of peak IGF-1 levels in both males and females used in the meta-analysis is presented in Figure 3.
Figure 2Figure 2
Forest Plots Showing (A) Results of 6 Studies in Females Showing Significant Rise of Serum IGF-1 from CVMI 2 to CVMI 3, 4, and 5, and (B) Results of 5 Studies in Males Showing Significant Rise of Serum IGF-1 from CVMI 2 to CVMI 3 and 4.
Figure 3Figure 3
Pictorial Representation of Peak IGF-1 Levels in Both Males and Females for the Studies Included in the Meta-analysis (Tripathi,22 Kahlon,43 Anusuya,44 Jain,46 Sinha,48 Jain,53 and Ishaq56).

DISCUSSION

The current meta-analysis explored the association of biomarkers in multiple body fluids (GCF, saliva, blood, serum, urine) with the stages of skeletal maturation as observed in CVM staging on lateral cephalograms or SMIs on hand-wrist radiographs. Due to the heterogeneity of data, we were able to perform meta-analysis for only seven studies evaluating IGF-1 in serum (Figure 2).22,43,44,46,48,53,56 Of these, five studies in only males and six studies in only females were included for analysis.

The meta-analysis in males showed significant rise of serum IGF-1 levels from CVMI 2 to CVMI 3 and 4, and in females from CVMI 2 to CVMI 3, 4, and 5. The CVMI 3 stage corresponds to the circum-pubertal stage of accelerating skeletal growth. The peak IGF-1 levels in CVMI 3 can be explained on the basis of blood IGF-1 having a role in influencing the replication of osteoprogenitor cells and their differentiation into mature osteoblasts by stimulating osteocalcin synthesis in bone.72,73 This can be confirmed by related literature evidence of a positive correlation of IGF-1 and osteocalcin, which is a marker for late osteoblastic differentiation in serum across all skeletal stages.7476

A few studies on serum IGF-1 that did not qualify for meta-analysis have also shown peak serum IGF-1 at CS3,46 CS4,62 and at SMIs 6–8 (high growth velocity stage)38,61 on hand-wrist radiographs. This agrees with the results of the meta-analysis, showing a peak at CVMI 3 and no significant difference between CVMI 3 and 4, as all these stages correspond to heightened skeletal growth activity in growing individuals. Interestingly, the current review also indicates the serum growth hormone (GH)/IGF-1 ratio as a potent marker for skeletal maturation compared with IGF-1 alone. This is supported by literature evidence that IGF-1 is directly or indirectly influenced by GH production, and serum GH/IGF-1 ratio can assess growth and its deficiencies more accurately than IGF-1 levels alone.77,78 Besides, growth hormone is known to mediate maxillary and mandibular growth, which is designated by a positive correlation between IGF-1 level and its binding protein (IGFBP-3), as seen in one study included in the meta-analysis.46 A rise in IGFBP-3 implies increased biological activity of circulating IGF-179 and is a more accurate marker of skeletal maturation compared to IGF-1, which may be explored in future SME studies.

A significant association has also been established between serum IGF-1 levels and anterior facial height in longitudinal evaluation in the current review.50 This can be explained by the influence of the strength of the masticatory apparatus and the evolution of dietary patterns on mid-face and mandibular growth, which is further based on genetics and environment.80 Ascending IGF-1 levels above 250 ng/mL were associated with greater mandibular growth compared to IGF-1 below 250 ng/mL.49,50 This can be of great clinical significance as timely assessments of IGF-1 levels can guide clinicians regarding the pattern of rise or fall of IGF-1, and related treatment alternatives to be selected.

The current review provides some interesting insights into IGF-1 cut-off levels and ratios that may require further exploration. Residual mandibular growth was depicted by higher IGF-1 levels after attaining CVMI 6 in one study,57 which can further assist orthodontists in planning orthopedic treatment in the late circum-pubertal stages of growth. The IGF-1 limits for orthopedic and orthodontic treatment were identified as 310–360 ng/mL and 258–302 ng/mL, respectively.57 This finding can be further explored to outline the cut-off values for various orthodontic treatment types in clinical orthodontic setups. The treatment window for any skeletal modulation was identified by the time when the individual reached maturity in the same cervical stage, as in early or late maturers.53 This concept can be further explored with respect to the various body types and body weight.

The meta-analysis also studied sex-related difference in serum IGF-1 levels. Individual female data showed a significant rise in serum IGF-1 from CVMI 2 to stages CVMI 3, 4 and 5, while males showed a significant rise from CVMI 2 to CVMI 3 and 4. Other studies are also in agreement and show peak IGF-1 in males at the CS4 stage (corresponding to CVMI staging),21,22,44,49 compared to females who peak at CS3 followed by a decline in levels.21,22,44,46,49,55 The delayed and sustained puberty in males occurs due to a combination of growth hormone secretion mediated by IGF-1 production and lower estrogen levels.81 The early pubertal peak in females can be explained based on the role of DHEAS in stimulating IGF-1 and enhancing estrogen production.82 Thus, DHEAS shows an earlier peak in females at CS3 than in males at CS4.44 This difference of IGF-1 levels between males and females also influences osteocalcin levels, which shows a statistically significant correlation with IGF-1 across all CVMI stages (P<0.01) in males and across CVMI 3–6 in females.22

The remaining studies in other biofluids, including GCF and saliva, were not included in the meta-analysis, but they are extremely important to review for the outcomes and limitations of the current literature. These biofluids have advantages of non-invasive and repeated collection. The comprehensive review of biomarkers in all biofluids may aid planning of future studies to generate a higher level of evidence for the most potent mediator in an opportune medium using a robust methodology.

Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) has been explored sufficiently in orthodontic tooth movement,16,17 but its role in assessment of skeletal maturation markers is promising, yet not explored sufficiently. The current review shows a significantly higher ALP level in GCF at pubertal stage compared with the pre- or post-pubertal stage.25,40,59,60 The peak at the pubertal stage can be explained based on the role of ALP in skeletal bone mineralization, growth, and remodeling. Previous literature supports increased levels of serum ALP during pubertal growth in patients undergoing tooth movement.83 Serum ALP levels may influence GCF ALP levels,25 and association of local variables like dental eruption status affecting serum ALP still needs further exploration. The ALP levels in GCF can be measured both as absolute and normalized (relative to the total protein content). Of these, normalized ALP is shown to be more accurate than absolute ALP levels for growth markers in the current review.59,60

Other markers like vitamin D binding protein (DBP) and serotransferrin (TF) also show a higher GCF percentage in pubertal (CS3, 4) compared to non-pubertal stage.24,45 However, a normal range for each biomarker is required to be established for each cervical stage.

Similar to the ALP levels in GCF, salivary ALP activity was increased in the early pre-pubertal stage (CS1 compared with CS2), followed by peak salivary protein concentration in CS3 and CS5.27 However, these results slightly contradict previous literature which reported highest salivary ALP levels in pubertal spurt using MP3 staging, cervical vertebral maturation staging, or physical maturation showing a hormonal surge.68,69,84 The difference can be attributed to studying normalized ALP rather than absolute ALP levels in the current review. The only limitation in detecting ALP in saliva is that its level in saliva is 4–5 times less than in plasma.85 Hence, for saliva, highly sensitive high-throughput techniques are required to detect minute quantities of biomarkers, but these are costly and not available routinely.

Another sensitive and specific marker for bone formation is bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) which has been investigated previously for changes in bone volume and density corresponding to age or stages of sexual development and during orthodontic tooth movement.86,87 But it has not yet been explored for skeletal maturation in both saliva and serum. The current review brought forth one study that mentioned a regression equation for predicting pubertal onset using salivary BALP levels along with chronological age and body mass index (BMI) percentile.23 Their findings were supported by a previous study that showed serum BALP to peak at puberty,88 and thus it can be further explored for variation in saliva for predicting pubertal onset.

Higher salivary IGF-1 at high velocity of skeletal growth, or pubertal peak in QCVM II stage,52 is also shown in the current review. This finding is similar to IGF-1 levels in serum and to another study depicting salivary IGF-1 peak (6.15±1.04 pg/mL) at puberty.37,38,43,89 According to previous literature, the factors influencing levels of free circulating IGF-1 in saliva are body mass index (BMI) and malnutrition status,90 which may be further explored as contributing factors to skeletal maturation status.

The current review has discussed various biomarkers for skeletal maturation, and has brought forth many novel and interesting findings. Although only four studies on serum IGF-1 qualified for meta-analysis, it highlights the need for standardized robust methodology and assessment criteria for biomarker studies in skeletal maturation. Some areas that require further exploration include a need for biomarker cut-off levels for each cervical stage, studying the ratios of serum GH/IGF-1 and IGF-1/ IGFBP-3 rather than absolute IGF-1 levels, and investigating salivary BALP as a very sensitive predictor of pubertal onset along with age and BMI percentile.

Study Limitations
  • Heterogeneity in the biomarker category, sample selection, method of analysis, and observation times. Lack of standardized protocol for sample collection timing, technique, transfer, and storage.
  • The difference in sensitivity in assays, laboratories, and populations potentially interferes with consistency in results and conclusions.

CONCLUSION

  • Meta-analysis showed a significant difference in serum IGF-1 levels between CS3, CS4, and CS5 compared to CS2 in a combined sample of males and females. However, the interpretation of the association should be made with caution due to the heterogeneity of the original studies.
  • We found a statistically significant rise in biomarkers in GCF (DBP, TF, and ALP), saliva (ALP, IGF-1, and BALP), and blood and serum (IGF-1, IGF-1/IGFBP-3 ratio, osteocalcin, BALP) at the pubertal stage (CS3, CS4) compared with pre-pubertal (CS1, CS2) and post-pubertal stages (CS5, CS6).
  • Metabolites (glucose, mannose, pyroglutamic acid, glycerol, glyceric acid) show differences among pre-pubertal, pubertal, and post-pubertal stages of skeletal maturation. Further studies are required for confirmation.

Further Recommendations
  • Future studies must consider heterogeneity in studies related to ethnicity, sample size, sexual dimorphism, and early or late maturity.
  • Saliva, GCF, and urine can be explored as non-invasive biofluids for marker assessment.
  • All body fluids must be simultaneously studied to draw biological associations and correlations with the pre-identified skeletal maturation index.
  • Metabolites may be explored further for association with skeletal, dental, and chronological age.
  • There is a need to identify and develop a robust skeletal maturity biomarker as a chairside, sensitive, reliable tool to aid clinical decision-making and choice of orthodontic treatment alternatives.

Supplementary Information
Abbreviations

ALP alkaline phosphatase
BALP bone-specific alkaline phosphatase
CS cervical maturation stage(s)
CVM cervical vertebral maturation
CVMI cervical vertebral maturation index
DBP vitamin-D binding protein
DHEAS dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate
ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
GCF gingival crevicular fluid
GH growth hormone
IGF-1 insulin-like growth factor
MP3 middle phalanx of the third finger
PHV peak height velocity
PTHrP parathormone-related protein
QCVM quantitative cervical vertebral maturation
QUADAS-2 Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
ROB risk of bias
SME skeletal maturity evaluation
SMI skeletal maturity indicator
TF serotransferrin

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES
1.
Dhiman S, Maheshwari S, Verma SK. Assessment of maturity in orthodontics: a review. J Adv Clin Res Insights. 2015;2:100–3. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.jcri.54.
2.
Demirjian A, Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Patterson DK. Interrelationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental, and sexual maturity. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:433–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90070-3.
3.
Mardiati, E.; Komara, I.; Halim, H.; Maskoen, AM. Determination of pubertal growth plot using hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae maturation indices, dental calcification, peak height velocity, and menarche. Open Dent J. 2021. pp. 228–40. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602115010228.
4.
Singh S, Sandhu N, Puri T, Gulati R, Kashyap R. A study of correlation of various growth indicators with chronological age. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2015;8:190–5. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1311.
5.
Veena, GV.; Tripathi, T. Non-invasive methods for the assessment of biomarkers and their correlation with radiographic maturity indicators — a scoping review. Prog Orthod. 2021. p. 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-021-00372-6.
6.
Fishman LS. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation. A clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films. Angle Orthod. 1982;52:88–112. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(1982)052%3c0088:REOSM%3e2.0.CO;2.
7.
Madhu S, Hegde AM, Munshi AK. The developmental stages of the middle phalanx of the third finger (MP3): a sole indicator in assessing the skeletal maturity? J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2003;27:149–56. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.27.2.qtj75rg3714l5543.
8.
Lamparski, DG. Skeletal Age Assessment Utilizing Cervical Vertebrae [Master’s Thesis]. Pittsburgh, PA, USA: University of Pittsburgh; 1972.
9.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119–29. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005.
10.
Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:316–23. https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2002)072%3c0316:AIVOTC%3e2.0.CO;2.
11.
Hägg U, Taranger J. Maturation indicators and the pubertal growth spurt. Am J Orthod. 1982;82:299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(82)90464-x.
12.
Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70157-5.
13.
Hegde DY, Baliga S, Yeluri R, Munshi AK. Digital radiograph of the middle phalanx of the third finger (MP3) region as a tool for skeletal maturity assessment. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23:447–53. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.104947.
14.
Perinetti G, Contardo L. Reliability of growth indicators and efficiency of functional treatment for skeletal class II malocclusion: current evidence and controversies. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1367691. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1367691.
15.
Kanbur NÖ, Derman O, Kınık E. The relationships between pubertal development, IGF-1 axis, and bone formation in healthy adolescents. J Bone Miner Metab. 2005;23:76–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00774-004-0544-9.
16.
Kapoor P, Kharbanda OP, Monga N, Miglani R, Kapila S. Effect of orthodontic forces on cytokine and receptor levels in gingival crevicular fluid: a systematic review. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-014-0065-6.
17.
Kapoor, P.; Monga, N.; Kharbanda, OP.; Kapila, S.; Miglani, R.; Moganty, R. Effect of orthodontic forces on levels of enzymes in gingival crevicular fluid (GCF): a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod. 2019. pp. 40e1–40.e22. https://doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.24.2.40.e1-22.onl.
18.
Kaur A, Kharbanda OP, Kapoor P, Kalyanasundaram D. A review of biomarkers in peri-miniscrew implant crevicular fluid (PMICF). Prog Orthod. 2017;18:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0195-8.
19.
Yang L, Grey V. Pediatric reference intervals for bone markers. Clin Biochem. 2006;39:561–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2005.11.015.
20.
Tripathi T, Gupta P, Rai P, et al. Longitudinal evaluation of the association between insulin-like growth factor-1, bone specific alkaline phosphatase and changes in mandibular length. Sci Rep. 2019;9:11582. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48067-7.
21.
Tripathi T, Gupta P, Sharma J, Rai P, Gupta VK, Singh N. Bone-specific alkaline phosphatase - a potential biomarker for skeletal growth assessment. J Orthod. 2018;45:4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/14653125.2017.1416571.
22.
Tripathi T, Gupta P, Rai P, Sharma J, Gupta VK, Singh N. Osteocalcin and serum insulin-like growth factor-1 as biochemical skeletal maturity indicators. Prog Orthod. 2017;18:30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0184-y.
23.
Wijaya H, Kusdhany LS, Redjeki S, Soegiharto BM. Salivary bone-specific alkaline phosphatase as predictor of puberty phase. J Int Dent Medical Res. 2019;12:1063–7.
24.
Wen, X.; Gu, Y. Preliminary validation of serotransferrin and vitamin D binding protein in the gingival crevicular fluid as candidate biomarkers for pubertal growth peak in subjects with class I and class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021. pp. 415–25e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.01.025.
25.
Giuseppe P, Luca C. Gingival crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase activity in relation to pubertal growth spurt and dental maturation: a multiple regression study. South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res. 2016;3 https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr3-1265.
26.
Pellegrini GG, Gonzales CM, Somoza JC, Friedman SM, Zeni SN. Correlation between salivary and serum markers of bone turnover in osteopenic rats. J Periodontol. 2008;79:158–65. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070168.
27.
Alhazmi N, Trotman CA, Finkelman M, Hawley D, Zoukhri D, Papathanasiou E. Salivary alkaline phosphatase activity and chronological age as indicators for skeletal maturity. Angle Orthod. 2019;89:637–42. https://doi.org/10.2319/030918-197.1.
28.
Tripathi, T.; Ganesh, G.; Singh, N.; Rai, P. Serum biomarkers associated with radiographic skeletal maturity indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod. 2023. pp. 127–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125221118934.
29.
Tisè M, Ferrante L, Mora S, Tagliabracci A. A biochemical approach for assessing cutoffs at the age thresholds of 14 and 18 years: a pilot study on the applicability of bone specific alkaline phosphatase on an Italian sample. Int J Legal Med. 2016;130:1149–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-016-1382-8.
30.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AWS, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–36. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
31.
McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. The cervical vertebral maturation method: a user’s guide. Angle Orthod. 2018;88:133–43. https://doi.org/10.2319/111517-787.1.
32.
Chen LL, Xu TM, Jiang JH, Zhang XZ, Lin JX. Quantitative cervical vertebral maturation assessment in adolescents with normal occlusion: a mixed longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:720e1–720.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.014.
33.
Rajagopal R, Kansal S. A comparison of modified MP3 stages and the cervical vertebrae as growth indicators. J Clin Orthod. 2002;36:398–406.
34.
Grave KC, Brown T. Skeletal ossification and the adolescent growth spurt. Am J Orthod. 1976;69:611–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90143-3.
35.
Björk A. Timing of interceptive orthodontic measures based on stages of maturation. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1972:61–74.
36.
Hägg U, Taranger J. Skeletal stages of the hand and wrist as indicators of the pubertal growth spurt. Acta Odontol Scand. 1980;38:187–200. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358009004719.
37.
Almalki, A. Association of salivary IGF and IGF/ IGFBP-3 molar ratio with cervical vertebral maturation stages from pre-adolescent to post-adolescent transition period—a cross-sectional exploratory study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. pp. 5172–83. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095172.
38.
Almalki, A.; Thomas, JT.; Khan, ARA., et al. Correlation between salivary levels of IGF-1, IGFBP-3, IGF-1/IGFBP3 ratio with skeletal maturity using hand-wrist radiographs. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. p. 3723. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063723.
39.
Al Meshari, SZ.; Aldweesh, AH. Correlation between salivary dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels and cervical vertebral maturation in Saudi individuals. Saudi Dent J. 2022. pp. 355–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.05.001.
40.
Sookhakian, A.; Zahed, M.; Pakshir, H.; Ajami, S. Salivary IGF-1 and alkaline phosphatase-based modeling for skeletal maturity prediction in orthodontic patients. Biomed Res Int. 2022. p. 2390865. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2390865.
41.
Tsagkari, E.; Deda, O.; Krokos, A.; Gika, H.; Papadopoulos, MA.; Chatzigianni, A. Investigation of salivary biomarkers as indicators of skeletal and dental maturity in children. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2022. pp. 576–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12572.
42.
Carelli, J.; Mattos, C.; Morais, ND., et al. Correlation between insulin-like growth factor I and skeletal maturity indicators. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021. p. 2333794X211011305. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X211011305.
43.
Kahlon, SS.; Aggarwal, V.; Ahluwalia, KS., et al. Cross-sectional study to assess serum insulin like growth factor-1 levels (IGF-1) in female and male subjects in relation to various stages of cervical vertebrae maturation. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2021. pp. 117–23. https://doi.org/10.31782/IJCRR.2021.13623.
44.
Anusuya, V.; Nagar, A.; Tandon, P.; Singh, GK.; Singh, GP.; Mahdi, AA. Serum DHEA-S levels could be used as a comparable diagnostic test to assess the pubertal growth spurt in dentofacial orthopedics. Prog Orthod. 2020. p. 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00317-5.
45.
Wen X, Franchi L, Chen F, Gu Y. Proteomic analysis of gingival crevicular fluid for novel biomarkers of pubertal growth peak. Eur J Orthod. 2018;40:414–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx082.
46.
Jain N, Tripathi T, Gupta SK, Rai P, Kanase A, Kalra S. Serum IGF-1, IGFBP-3 and their ratio: potential biochemical growth maturity indicators. Prog Orthod. 2017;18:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0165-1.
47.
Venkatagiriappa S, Raman A, Sharma A. The role of blood spot dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels in adjunct to hand wrist radiographs as skeletal maturity indicator. Turk J Orthod. 2016;29:69–72. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2016.0015.
48.
Sinha M, Tripathi T, Rai P, Gupta SK. Serum and urine insulin-like growth factor-1 as biochemical growth maturity indicators. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016;150:1020–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.04.028.
49.
Gupta S, Deoskar A, Gupta P, Jain S. Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 levels in females and males in different cervical vertebral maturation stages. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015;20:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-9451.20.2.068-075.oar.
50.
Masoud MI, Marghalani HYA, Bamashmous M, et al. Predicting changes in mandibular length and total anterior facial height using IGF-1, cervical stage, skeletal classification, and gender. Prog Orthod. 2015;16:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-015-0076-y.
51.
Masoud MI, Marghalani HYA, Alamoudi NM, El Derw D, Masoud IM, Gowharji NF. Longitudinal relationship between insulin-like growth factor-1 levels and vertical facial growth. J Orofac Orthop. 2015;76:440–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-015-0305-5.
52.
Nayak S, Bhad Patil WA, Doshi UH. The relationship between salivary insulin-like growth factor I and quantitative cervical maturational stages of skeletal maturity. J Orthod. 2014;41:170–4. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000091.
53.
Jain S, Jain S, Deoskar A, Sai Prasad VS. Serum IGF-1 levels as a clinical tool for optimizing orthodontic treatment timing. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:46. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-46.
54.
Hussain MZ, Talapaneni AK, Prasad M, Krishnan R. Serum PTHrP level as a biomarker in assessing skeletal maturation during circumpubertal development. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:515–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.022.
55.
Gupta S, Jain S, Gupta P, Deoskar A. Determining skeletal maturation using insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) test. Prog Orthod. 2012;13:288–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pio.2011.09.006.
56.
Ishaq RAR, Soliman SAZ, Foda MY, Fayed MMS. Insulin-like growth factor I: a biologic maturation indicator. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142:654–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.06.015.
57.
Masoud MI, Marghalani HYA, Masoud IM, Gowharji NF. Prospective longitudinal evaluation of the relationship between changes in mandibular length and blood-spot IGF-1 measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141:694–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.021.
58.
Srinivasan B, Premkumar S. Assessment of serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate in subjects during the pre-pubertal, pubertal, and adult stages of skeletal maturation. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:447–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjr041.
59.
Perinetti G, Franchi L, Castaldo A, Contardo L. Gingival crevicular fluid protein content and alkaline phosphatase activity in relation to pubertal growth phase. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:1047–52. https://doi.org/10.2319/123111-806.1.
60.
Perinetti G, Baccetti T, Contardo L, Di Lenarda R. Gingival crevicular fluid alkaline phosphatase activity as a non-invasive biomarker of skeletal maturation. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2011;14:44–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2010.01506.x.
61.
Masoud MI, Masoud I, Kent RL, Gowharji N, Hassan AH, Cohen LE. Relationship between blood-spot insulin-like growth factor 1 levels and hand-wrist assessment of skeletal maturity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.07.023.
62.
Masoud M, Masoud I, Kent RL Jr, Gowharji N, Cohen LE. Assessing skeletal maturity by using blood spot insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) testing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134:209–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.09.063.
63.
Hegde SS, Revankar AV, Patil AK. Identification of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase in saliva and its correlation with skeletal age. Indian J Dent Res. 2018;29:721–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.IJDR_298_15.
64.
Nancy ED, Yezdani AA, Kannan MS, Kumar SK, Padmavathy K. Serum insulin like growth factor-1 – a skeletal maturity indicator for the assessment of orthopedic treatment timing of skeletal class II malocclusion. Biomed Pharmacol J. 2019;12:233–8. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/1632.
65.
Trehan, M.; Patil, C. Evaluation of alkaline phosphatase as skeletal maturity indicator in gingival crevicular fluid. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021. pp. 512–17. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1996.
66.
Sowmya, J.; Sasidhar, YN.; Varma, NS.; Preetam, R.; Prasad, KG. Cortisol: a biomarker in assessing skeletal maturation during circumpubertal development. Int J Oral Health Med Res. 2016. https://www.ijohmr.org/page.php?page=volume-3-issue-1.
67.
Wijaya H, Soetanto MFL, Redjeki S, Soegiharto BM. The salivary bone-specific alkaline phosphatase in relation to pubertal growth phase in Indonesian children. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2017;10:389–92. https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2017.v10i5.17752.
68.
Irham, F.; Bahirrah, S.; Nazruddin The Level of Alkaline Phosphatase in Saliva as Biomarker for Pubertal Growth Phase. In: Abbot PV, Tseng PSK, Porto ICCM, Lestari W. , editors. Proceedings of the International Dental Conference of Sumatera Utara 2017 (IDCSU 2017); December 7–9, 2017; Medan, Indonesia Dordrecht. the Netherlands: Atlantis Press; 2018. pp. 102–5. https://doi.org/10.2991/idcsu-17.2018.27.
69.
Tarvade SM, Ramkrishna S, Sarode S. Salivary alkaline phosphatase - a biochemical marker for growth prediction. Ind J Basic Applied Med Res. 2015;4:17–22.
70.
Wen, X.; Gu, Y.; Chen, F. Gingival crevicular fluid as a novel potential source of biomarkers distinguishes pubertal from post-pubertal subjects. Diagnostics (Basel). 2016. p. 41. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics6040041.
71.
Page, MJ.; McKenzie, JE.; Bossuyt, PM., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021. p. n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
72.
Canalis E. Effect of growth factors on bone cell replication and differentiation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:246–63.
73.
Canalis E, Lian JB. Effects of bone associated growth factors on DNA, collagen and osteocalcin synthesis in cultured fetal rat calvariae. Bone. 1988;9:243–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(88)90037-3.
74.
Isgaard J, Nilsson A, Lindahl A, Jansson JO, Isaksson OG. Effects of local administration of GH and IGF-1 on longitudinal bone growth in rats. Am J Physiol. 1986;250:E367–72. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.1986.250.4.E367.
75.
Johansson A, Lindh E, Ljunghall S. Insulin-like growth factor I stimulates bone turnover in osteoporosis. Lancet. 1992;339:1619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91889-g.
76.
Johansen JS, Giwercman A, Hartwell D, et al. Serum bone Gla-protein as a marker of bone growth in children and adolescents: correlation with age, height, serum insulin-like growth factor I, and serum testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67:273–8. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-67-2-273.
77.
Ashpole NM, Sanders JE, Hodges EL, Yan H, Sonntag WE. Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor-1 and the aging brain. Exp Gerontol. 2015;68:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2014.10.002.
78.
Rosenfeld RG, Albertsson-Wikland K, Cassorla F, et al. Diagnostic controversy: the diagnosis of childhood growth hormone deficiency revisited. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:1532–40. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.80.5.7538145.
79.
Juul A, Dalgaard P, Blum WF, et al. Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in healthy infants, children, and adolescents: the relation to IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-1, IGFBP-2, age, sex, body mass index, and pubertal maturation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:2534–42. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.80.8.7543116.
80.
Corruccini RS. Australian aboriginal tooth succession, interproximal attrition, and Begg’s theory. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:349–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(90)70107-N.
81.
Carani C, Qin K, Simoni M, et al. Effect of testosterone and estradiol in a man with aromatase deficiency. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:91–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199707103370204.
82.
Kroboth P, Salek F, Pittenger A, Fabian T, Frye R. DHEA and DHEA-S: a review. J Clin Pharmacol. 1999;39:327–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/00912709922007903.
83.
Szulc P, Seeman E, Delmas PD. Biochemical measurements of bone turnover in children and adolescents. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11:281–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001980070116.
84.
Cabras T, Pisano E, Boi R, et al. Age-dependent modifications of the human salivary secretory protein complex. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:4126–34. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr900212u.
85.
Bel’skaya, LV.; Sarf, EA.; Kosenok, VK. Age and gender characteristics of the biochemical composition of saliva: correlations with the composition of blood plasma. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020. pp. 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.02.004.
86.
Keeling SD, King GJ, McCoy EA, Valdez M. Serum and alveolar bone phosphatase changes reflect bone turnover during orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103:320–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70012-D.
87.
Rauchenzauner M, Schmid A, Heinz-Erian P, et al. Sex- and age-specific reference curves for serum markers of bone turnover in healthy children from 2 months to 18 years. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:443–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1706.
88.
Mora S, Pitukcheewanont P, Kaufman FR, Nelson JC, Gilsanz V. Biochemical markers of bone turnover and the volume and the density of bone in children at different stages of sexual development. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1664–71. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1999.14.10.1664.
89.
Sharmilaa, S. IGF-1 and VEGF in Saliva and Its Relation with CVMI Stages in Determining the Skeletal Maturity [Master’s Thesis]. Tamil Nadu, India: K.S.R. Institute of Dental Science and Research Tiruchengode; 2017. Available at: http://repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in/5271/1/240519617sharmilaa.pdf.
90.
Paszynska E, Dmitrzak-Weglarz M, Slopien A, Tyszkiewicz-Nwafor M, Rajewski A. Salivary and serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) assays in anorexic patients. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2016;17:615–21. https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2015.1023356.