Keywords: Computed tomography, coronavirus infection, COVID-19, magnetic resonance imaging, maxillary sinuses, mucormycosis, paranasal sinus
Published online 2022 October 27. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10483.
Multimodal Imaging in Rhinoorbitocerebral Mucormycosis Associated with Type 2 Diabetes After COVID-19
1Radiology Department, Clinic of Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia
2Department of Radiology, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia
3Otorhinolaryngology Department, Clinic of Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: email@example.com
Copyright : © 2022 Zelter et al
This is an open-access article. All its content, except where otherwise noted, is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
PurposeThis case series analyzed the appropriateness of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for visualization of rhinoorbitocerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) patterns associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) post-recovery from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
MethodsThe study included 24 patients with invasive ROCM after having recovered from COVID-19. All patients underwent CT examinations and microbiological and histological verification; 5 patients underwent MRI.
ResultsThe CT and MRI patterns noted in our patients revealed involvement of skull orbits, paranasal sinuses, large arteries, and optic nerves, with intracranial spread and involvement of the cranial base bones. Using brain scan protocol for CT provided better soft-tissue resolution. We found that extending the MRI protocol by T2-sequence with fat suppression or STIR was better for periantral fat and muscle evaluations.
ConclusionComputed tomography of the paranasal sinuses is the method of choice for suspected fungal infections, particularly mucormycosis. However, MRI is recommended if there is suspicion of orbital, vascular, or intracranial complications, including cavernous sinus extension. The combination of both CT and MRI enables determination of soft tissue invasion and bony destruction, thereby facilitating the choice of an optimal ROCM treatment strategy. Invasive fungal infections are extremely rare in Europe; most of the related data are provided from India and Middle Eastern or African nations. Hence, this study is notable in its use of only diagnosed ROCM cases in Russia.
Keywords: Computed tomography, coronavirus infection, COVID-19, magnetic resonance imaging, maxillary sinuses, mucormycosis, paranasal sinus
Rhinoorbitocerebral mucormycosis (ROCM) is an aggressive fungal infection that is potentially lethal. The infection involves the sinuses but may destroy facial bones and invade other skull structures. It commonly occurs in immunocompromised patients following hormonal, monoclonal antibody, or broad-spectrum antibiotics therapies. One risk factor stands out, namely uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
Before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, mucormycosis was reported in isolated cases from different places in the world. Most of these patients had a background of oncological or hematological disease. However, since the onset of the pandemic, more patients have been reported with ROCM after having been treated for COVID-19.1
A recent publication by the European Confederation of Medical Mycology and the International Society of Human and Animal Mycoses identified 80 cases of COVID-19-associated ROCM.2 The median age of these patients was 55 years (range 10–86 years); 79% were males. Overall mortality was 31%. Similar results were published by Singh et al.3
The aggressive nature of ROCM requires immediate diagnosis and treatment.4 Hence, empirical antifungal therapy should be initiated in patients with clinical signs of ROCM, before confirming the diagnosis by microbiological or histopathological methods.5 Diagnostic imaging is vital in supporting the diagnosis and visualization of the extent of involvement of the orbital structures and brain.
Mucormycosis spreads by invading the adjacent tissues, causing bony destruction, and spreading through the bone and anatomical channels (nasolacrimal ducts, lymphatic vessels, and neurovascular bundles).6 Comprehensive assessment of mucormycoses requires computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly aimed at imaging these anatomical regions. Mazzai et al. published a pictorial review of mucormycosis from onset to vascular complications, and proposed a three-stage grading system of anatomical structure involvement (Table 1),8 which was expanded upon by Kumar et al.9 The three stages include sinonasal, orbital, and intracranial involvement. The objective of this study was to describe CT and MRI findings in 24 patients with ROCM associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and COVID-19 infection.
This case series study was approved by the local ethics committee (approval ID: 12-2021). The study included 24 diabetic patients who had recovered from diagnosed COVID-19 and presented with ROCM complications. All patients were hospitalized in the ENT Department of Clinics of Samara State Medical University between November and December 2021. As part of their workup, the patients underwent chest and paranasal sinus CT scans via a 128-slice Revolution EVO CT scanner (General Electric, Moscow, Russia) with and without contrast enhancement; 5 of these patients also underwent contrast-enhanced MRI of the skull orbits and brain using the 1.5-T Magnetom Aera (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). All patients underwent surgical treatment, and tissue samples were retrieved for histological examination for mucormycosis (Figure 1).
Twenty-four patients were included in this analysis: 13 females, 11 males; median age was 62 years (range 39–74 years). Upon COVID-19 diagnosis, all patients were treated with glucocorticoids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, immunomodulatory drugs, anticoagulants, and vitamins. The duration of COVID-19 hospital treatment ranged from 10 to 40 days. In 7 patients, ROCM developed between days 10 and 35 (mean 25 days) of their primary hospitalization for COVID-19. In 17 other patients, ROCM developed 2 weeks to 4 months (median 1.5 months) after hospital discharge and recovery from COVID-19. The development of ROCM in relation to COVID-19 is graphically presented in Figure 2.
All 24 patients suffered from T2D, 11 of which were first-time diagnoses while infected with COVID-19. Two patients were hospitalized for diabetic ketoacidosis coma with blood glucose levels up to 40 mmol/L (720 mg/dL). Common clinical symptoms of ROCM in our patients included headache, nasal breathing difficulty, nasal discharge (mucopurulent or bloody), facial soft tissue swelling, and visual impairment.
Chest CT scans in all patients revealed bilateral interstitial pneumonia in the form of reticular changes in the lung tissue with curvilinear sealing; no evidence of pulmonary fungal infection was identified in any of the CTs.
Paranasal sinus CT was performed in all 24 patients, 15 of which were done with contrast enhancement. Five patients also underwent contrast-enhanced cerebral and orbital MRI to better visualize ROCM invasion.
Table 2 summarizes the CT and MRI findings in all patients, including patient mortality.
Rhinoorbitocerebral mucormycosis is a rare and potentially lethal complication of COVID-19.10 Mortality rose to 43% in those with intracranial invasion, which was lower than the 90% reported by others.2 We presented 24 patients with mucormycosis associated with COVID-19 and identified the main visual signs on CT and MRI that radiologists should look for. Whenever indicated, we combined CT and MRI as compared to other studies in which only one imaging modality was used.6–8 Despite the better soft-tissue resolution of MRI, CT was better able to identify bone destruction, sequestration, and skull-base changes.
The mortality rate among our patients was 21%. Improved survival in our patients could be attributed partly to more effective treatment decisions based on improved diagnostics.
Several CT and MRI patterns were identified in our ROCM patients, discussed below, together with other possible findings noted in the literature.
Sinonasal InvolvementThe paranasal sinuses are air-filled structures; in the presence of ROCM they become filled with soft tissue-like content. Multiple sinus lesions were observed in about half of our patients.11 The paranasal sinus mucous membranes were thickened, with evidence of inflammatory changes. Soft tissue-like content filling the sinuses was associated with spreading to the surrounding tissues (Figure 3).
Bone Wall DestructionIn our patients, the spread of ROCM led to destruction of the bony walls enveloping the paranasal sinuses and orbits, as well as the base of the skull and the hard palate in 8 patients. Computed tomography revealed the presence of scattered intraosseous air bubbles, which may be specific to ROCM (Figure 4). This sign helped us to differentiate between ROCM destruction and other types of osteomyelitis. Whether intraosseous air bubbles are indeed characteristic of ROCM needs further verification.12
SequestrationThe symptoms of ROCM may lead patients to seek an initial consultation with a maxillofacial surgeon, as was the case with most of our patients. Upon initial examination, a fungal pathogen may be suspected. The problem with ROCM is that further bony destruction leads to sequestration, resulting in CT images similar to those seen in osteomyelitis. In our study, sequestration was found in 16 patients (Figure 5).
Skull Base InvolvementOsteomyelitis of the skull base is a rare complication that usually occurs at the advanced stages of ROCM. The angioinvasive fungal process leads to a wide spread of infection into deep soft tissues through perivascular channels resulting in massive sequestration,13 which was noted in 6 of our patients (Figure 5).
Orbital InvolvementIn 18 of our 24 patients, fungal mass prolapse into one or both orbits through destroyed or thinned paranasal sinus walls was noted, especially of the ethmoidal air cells of the ethmoid labyrinth. Spread into pterygopalatine fossae was also typical. As previously published, early signs of orbital involvement include soft-tissue infiltration and swelling of retroorbital fat around the oculomotor muscles.13 In our patients, retroorbital fat infiltration was better assessed on fat-suppressed MRI T2-WI images. Since orbital invasion usually occurred through the medial wall, inflammatory infiltration or abscess formation was observed along the medial side of the orbit with lateral displacement and edema of the medial rectus muscle. Noteworthy is the clearer visualization of the orbital component in MRI compared to CT scans (Figure 6).
Optic Nerve InvolvementIn cases of oculomotor muscles and optic nerve involvement, the main symptoms in our patients were periorbital edema, proptosis, decreased vision, and blindness. However, some patients suffered from eye muscle paralysis or weakness (ophthalmoplegia). Diffusion-weighted images revealed optic nerve infarction (n=4). In addition, physicians should be aware that the fungal invasion may involve the pia mater, which can be visualized on MRI as a post-contrast enhancement.14
Diffuse Orbital InfiltrationComputed tomography did not reveal the extent of periorbital disease in patients suffering from severe exophthalmos and limited ocular motility. However, in 18 patients, there was clinical suspicion of diffuse orbital infiltration. Indeed, changes were visible in the 5 of these patients undergoing MRI: edema of the interconal tissue with dotted hypointense areas in T2-WI and FLAIR modes with areas of diffusion restriction and invasion or ischemic changes of the optic nerve; our findings were in line with the literature.6
Orbital Apex InvolvementWhile not found in any of our patients, orbital apex involvement is clearly evident on MRI by an increased signal from the soft tissues of retrobulbar fat.15 Both the optic canal and superior orbital fissure may be involved. The latter is manifested clinically by the superior orbital fissure syndrome (SOFS), which is a complex of impaired function of the cranial nerves (III, IV, V, and VI) that enter the orbit through the superior orbital fissure (SOF). Clinical symptoms include: loss of sensation over the forehead, edema of the periorbital region, proptosis, pupil dilation, ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, loss of corneal reflex, loss of direct light reflex, presence of consensual reflex, loss of accommodation reflex, and lacrimal hyposecretion.16 The fungal infection (i.e. ROCM) can extend from the orbital apex posteriorly into the cavernous sinus and through the pterygopalatine fossa into the infratemporal fossa.17,18
Intracranial Spread of MucormycosisIntracranial spread of mucormycosis is usually by direct invasion through the lamina cribrosa, ethmoid walls, and frontal sinuses. Cranial fossae from the pterygopalatine fossa and along the internal carotid artery may also be directly infiltrated by mucormycosis, leading to occlusion or thrombosis of the central retinal artery, ophthalmic artery, or direct optic nerve infiltration.19 Perineural spread from the cavernous sinus along the trigeminal nerve can lead to predominant involvement of the posterior cranial fossa. An early intracranial spread is better assessed on contrast-enhanced MRI T1-WI images, manifested by leptomeningeal enhancement (Figure 7).
Other Intracranial ManifestationsOther intracranial manifestations of ROCM include infarcts and abscesses (Figure 8), the latter of which were noted in 3 of our patients. Fungal invasion of brain parenchyma manifests with fuzzy areas of MRI T2-WI hyperintensity and extravascular distribution. There is minimal perifocal edema and variable peripheral enhancement. Abscess formation is indicated by the development of a well-circumscribed mass with a liquefied central hyperintense MRI T2-WI nucleus showing diffusion restriction. Due to the poor immunogenic response of immunocompromised patients, ROCM abscesses may not show the typical well-defined margin enhancement as seen in the bacterial abscesses of non-immunodeficient patients.20
Middlebrooks et al.7 described a seven-variable CT-based diagnostic model for predicting acute invasive fungal sinusitis. The presence of any of seven patterns (spread to surrounding fat, orbits, pterygopalatine fossa, sphenopalatine foramen, nasolacrimal duct, lacrimal sac, bony destruction) provided 95% sensitivity and 86% specificity for fungal etiology. The presence of any two signs gave 88% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% positive predictive value for a diagnosis of invasive fungal sinusitis.
Differential Diagnosis Imaging FeaturesTypical CT findings can usually differentiate between an invasive fungal process and chronic osteomyelitis of the skull and facial bones. However, diagnosing the difference between the two processes is challenging. For example, polyposis of the paranasal sinuses may represent the infectious process itself; however, it can also be a secondary reaction of the mucosa to the ROCM invasion of the adjacent bone. The diagnostic challenge is further complicated by the presence of typical polyps. Computed tomography was not so effective in differentiating between reactive polyps, mucormycosis, and normal polyps, since the classical sign of polyps—hyperdense inclusions—can be caused by all three processes21 (Figure 9) as was the case in 18 of our patients; this was better visualized by MRI.
Our findings indicate that the degree of aggressiveness of ROCM may be determined using CT or MRI to identify the patchy bony destruction with scattered intraosseous air bubbles, infiltration, and invasion into the surrounding tissues. Mucosal thickening and polyposis are non-specific, so special attention should be paid to assessing surrounding tissue, such as the orbit, hard palate, maxilla, and brain. Computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses is the method of choice for suspected fungal infections such as ROCM. However, due to its high soft-tissue resolution, MRI is recommended if invasion beyond the sinuses is suspected. Although cavernous sinus involvement is reportedly common in ROCM,11 it was not identified in our patients.
Based on the analysis of this and other studies, several recommendations can be formulated for ROCM visualization:
Klimko NN, Khostelidi SN, Shadrivova OV, et al. Mucormycosis in oncohematology patients (results of the prospective study). Onkogematologiâ. 2017;12(9):14–22. [Russian]. https://doi.org/10.17650/1818-8346-2017-12-2-14-22.
Hoenigl, M.; Seidel, D.; Carvalho, A., et al. The emergence of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis: analysis of cases from 18 countries. May 122021 [accessed September 11, 2022]. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3844587 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3844587.
Singh, AK.; Singh, R.; Joshi, SR.; Misra, A. Mucormycosis in COVID-19: a systematic review of cases reported worldwide and in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021. p. 102146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2021.05.019.
Karadeniz Uğurlu Ş, Selim S, Kopar A, Songu M. Rhino-orbital mucormycosis: clinical findings and treatment outcomes of four cases. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2015;45:169–74. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.82474.
Honavar, SG. Code mucor: guidelines for the diagnosis, staging and management of rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis in the setting of COVID-19. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021. pp. 1361–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1165_21.
Sreshta, K.; Dave, TV.; Varma, DR., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021. pp. 1915–27. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_1439_21.
Middlebrooks EH, Frost CJ, De Jesus RO, Massini TC, Schmalfuss IM, Mancuso AA. Acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis: a comprehensive update of CT findings and design of an effective diagnostic imaging model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:1529–35. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a4298.
Mazzai, L.; Anglani, M.; Giraudo, C.; Martucci, M.; Cester, G.; Causin, F. Imaging features of rhinocerebral mucormycosis: from onset to vascular complications. Acta Radiol. 2022. pp. 232–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185120988828.
Kumar Gg S, Deepalam S, Siddiqui A, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: a multi-institutional retrospective study of imaging patterns. World Neurosurg. 2022;162:e131–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.107.
Roden MM, Zaoutis TE, Buchanan WL, et al. Epidemiology and outcome of zygomycosis: a review of 929 reported cases. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:634–53. https://doi.org/10.1086/432579.
Cappello, ZJ.; Minutello, K.; Dublin, AB. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan [accessed October 3, 2022]. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Nose Paranasal Sinuses [Updated Mar 25, 2022]. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499826/.
Chan LL, Singh S, Jones D, Diaz EM Jr, Ginsberg LE. Imaging of mucormycosis skull base osteomyelitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:828–31. [PubMed]
Jiang N, Zhao G, Yang S, et al. A retrospective analysis of eleven cases of invasive rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis presented with orbital apex syndrome initially. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016;16:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-016-0189-1.
Shen G, Shen X, Pu W, Zhang G, Lerner A, Gao B. Imaging of cerebrovascular complications of infection. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8:1039–51. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2018.11.08.
Kapur R, Sepahdari AR, Mafee MF, et al. MR imaging of orbital inflammatory syndrome, orbital cellulitis, and orbital lymphoid lesions: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:64–70. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.a1315.
Rai S, Rattan V. Traumatic superior orbital fissure syndrome: review of literature and report of three cases. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2012;3:222–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-5950.111392.
Sotoudeh H, Shafaat O, Aboueldahab N, Vaphiades M, Sotoudeh E, Bernstock J. Superior ophthalmic vein thrombosis: what radiologist and clinician must know? Eur J Radiol Open. 2019;6:258–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2019.07.002.
de Moura Feitoza L, Altemani A, Adolfo da Silva N Jr, Reis F. Teaching neuroimages: mucormycosis-associated vasculitis: a new sequence to show an old invasive infection. Neurology. 2019;92:e1796–7. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000007275.
Ghuman MS, Kaur S, Bhandal SK, Ahluwalia A, Saggar K. Bilateral optic nerve infarction in rhino-cerebral mucormycosis: a rare magnetic resonance imaging finding. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2015;6:403–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-3147.158790.
Gamba JL, Woodruff WW, Djang WT, Yeates AE. Craniofacial mucormycosis: assessment with CT. Radiology. 1986;160:207–2. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.160.1.3715034.
Hussain S, Woo EK, Conner SEJ. Head and neck imaging: sinonasal imaging. Imaging. 2013;22:1. https://doi.org/10.1259/imaging.20110001.